The ugliest issue was that URI look different when it comes from Internet Explorer than from
anywhere else because Internet Explorer partially (!) decodes the path and all other browsers and
Part /%20 before /C: is used to find out if it was decoded by Internet Explorer not.
Because handler is registered by the installer we can use separate handlers for freeplane and docear.
> I have not completely thought that through, but on first glance the idea sounds good.
> However, the question is if we want to have two schemas like freeplane:/// and docear:/// or
> something more general that could be used by both Freeplane and Docear (e.g. mm:///)